Nad vs rotel vs marantz It is "clearer" but is lacking. Detailed comparison of the NAD C316BEE V2 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Another worthy competitor is the NAD C 568 player retailing for $899. Looking at just a few competitors, ever present is the primary Rotel nemesis Marantz. 45 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . The bigger brands always seem to come with more features and bells and whistles. 00. NAD. On the market for a CD player to replace my old one. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz PM6007 and Rotel A14 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Features In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz Model 30 and Rotel RA-1592 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. (Like you, coming from an older Sony amp. This was in 1996, FWIW. Driving CV R-10s. The Denon AVR-X8500H front side is made of aluminium. Discussion Hey guys, Looking for advice and peoples thoughts on these amps. In this article, we will compare two popular models from these brands: the NAD C316BEE V2 and the Marantz PM6007. My plan is to buy a new receiver within 2 weeks time, so any input is greatly appreciated. Especially for movies. The audio brand was founded in 1972 by a British electrical engineer, but it was later sold to Im comparing a Rotel RA-1572II vs. User #31558 4301 posts. Video is not all that important. So how did the rotel nad arcam compared? Rotel was a bit harsh. They are equally good with different sets of virtues. Rotel S14 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Model 40n is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. If it looks like that from the outside, most of the time it has been neglected. Between NAD and Marantz I would [amazon bestseller=”Yamaha Receivers” items=”1″ tracking_id=”ac-info-20″] Marantz vs Yamaha. Gift Guides. NAD is most notable for its reliable power amplifiers. They are both NICE overall . Rotel A14 MKII is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the C 700 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. Marantz PM-14S1 that's coming in this week. The DAC inside is pretty good all things considered, I think the Decco makes a better DAC-preamp than a DAC-integrated amp. Marantz Model 30 is a Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the RA-1592 MKII is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. I bought a Rotel RSX 1550 (which was about $2K) and compared it head to head against a Marantz 7011 (which was about $2K) and I thought the Marantz sounded better in every single way. Martin L. The HT receiver I have in the garage has channel issues. The units in question are the Marantz 1070 and the NAD 3020 . As per this month's meta ranking, Marantz CD6007 received 2 recommendations: from What Hi-Fi (24 Oct 2024) and World Wide Stereo (10 Sep 2024). NAD C 338 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the A11 Tribute is a speaker. I also have a Marantz SR-5200 A/V receiver in my bedroom system. Between Rotel and Marantz - which has the better "sound". 70's silverface integrated Arcam and NAD are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry that produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, subwoofers, and amplifiers. The guys from whom i got the speakers was running thru mcintosh (but Detailed comparison of the NAD C316BEE V2 vs Marantz PM6007 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. In this review, we will be comparing C 338 and A12, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Rotel. The NAD C388 150 watt x 2 Integrated A NAD C542 2. I was unable to get a similar Nad locally to replace the 521i and so ended up getting a Cambridge Audio 640c v2 from Richer Sounds instead. espeically paired with entry level 2k/pair speakers. Dynamics and Bass Control: Both NAD setups excel in dynamics and bass control, particularly the 2400/3020A, making them more suitable for hard rock and metal compared to the Rotel. Marantz PM7000N is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the A14 MKII is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. Audio Room: Pioneer Elite VSX-84TXSi, Pioneer Elite DV-79AVi, Technics SL1500C, Rotel RCC-1055, Nakamichi I think Marantz did a good job on this one and it does have MM/MC phono inputs. 50 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC; Phono Input I'm about 2 or 3 months from making a purchase and the ones I'm looking at to replace it are the Marantz CD6007, Emotiva ERC-4, and the Rotel CD 11 Tribute. It was a bit more difficult to match a Rotel with speakers. Blakey mentioned NAD as well, but separates whereas yours is the single unit. Get the NAD and you'll get a total missmatch, a closed up sound. I always thought their house sound was thin and brightvery noticeably so. More musical, quieter and has lot more power, clean power than the Marantz. LIke the Rotel CD11, the NAD player has analog and digital out Nick, the same speakers sound good without EQ using his old Carver amp. I found the user manual of the Marantz to be much more specific and thorough (over 300 pages Marantz vs. Save Share Extensively listened to Rotel (1068/1075), NAD (T163/973) and Arcam (AVP700/P1000) separates plus their equivalent 7 channel receivers eg NAD 773, AVR300 (plus the Marantz SR8500 for good measure). Borish was an electrical engineer with a Ph. I currently own a Marantz CD5004. Hence, assuming someone more enlightened In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . Specifically I am looking at the Rotel RDV-1060 or 1050 vs Marantz DV 7600 (the DV 9600 is a bit more than I am willing to spend right now. Dr. At the time, though, they were being sold by other dealers. I've heard many opinion state that the NAD sound is superior to Rotel. 00 for being ugly minus 1. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 3050 and Marantz Model 40n first before getting into our more detailed comparison. 1 setup which uses an old Rotel RSX-1056 (5 X 75) for the centre and surrounds and a Rotel RB-1080 (2 X 200) for the mains. Save Share Rotel CD11 or Marantz CD6007. Coming from Marantz one of the things I think I might miss is Auro3D up mixing. My Marantz PM8006 integrated amp has a subtle and pleasant blue light that is on while operating, but the light on this CD11 is garish Certainly the Marantz CD 60 is worth a listen, as is the NAD C568, the Rega Apollo and the Rotel RCD-1572 MkII. 4, NAD T163/T973 combo, Marantz SR8500 and Rotel RSX-1056. Cambridge CXA81. Currently the RSP-1582 is Rotel’s top of line HT processor but the RSP-1582 does not support latest formats and codecs eg Dolby Atmos DTS-X Auro 3-D, 4K HDR Dolby Vision. He was pretty adamant about the Rotel smoking the NAD. So i want to see your opinions and reasons. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Rotel RA-1572 MKII and Marantz Model 40n first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Details; Is NAD on par with Rotel? Or, would anyone argue that one is definitely superior to the other. I'll toss out another suggestion: Onkyo C-7030, if you can find one. suggested NAD C 388 NAD C 338 Marantz PM8006 Rotel A12 Yamaha A-S801 Rotel A12 APart REVAMP2600 BC Acoustique EX-502 Astro AL 1 JVC KS I have always seen the NAD C542 compared to the Rotel RCD-1072. jimmyblues. Guests; Nad, Rotel, Rega. Both of them are costing me around 1. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz PM6007 and Rotel A12 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I find the user interface on marantz to be superior to that of NAD, and NAD seems to be a generation behind marantz on technology, for example marantz had Atmos receivers well ahead of NAD. Basically the Denon lacks the warmth and smoothness I am used to, Audyssey on or off. Dec 10, 2017. Audiolab 6000A 50 watts NAD and Cambridge are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. Both amplifiers are known for their excellent sound quality, build quality, and features. Also, had I chosen the NAD, all of the inputs would be maxed out by the time I first set it up, whereas the Marantz has more input and outputs than I will ever need, but good to have should I want to expand. Besides, your Rotel RSP-1576 is not a Rotel’s top of the line HT processor. Loud thump when I switch I have a Marantz CD4000 the model down from the CD5000 which may well be discontinued by now. When combined with a high-quality speaker, they drive speakers with warm sound. Detailed comparison of the NAD Masters Series M33 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. I'm about 2 or 3 months from making a purchase and the ones I'm looking at to replace it are the Marantz CD6007, Emotiva ERC-4, and the Rotel CD 11 Tribute. Umboppa wrote In short, I am intrigued. Denon builds the world’s first 13. +1 on either the NAD or the Marantz. Audiolab 6000A 50 NAD C370/270 bi-amping Ruark Prelude II's, running from a Marantz 6000OSE CD player. Rotel: NAD C658 vs Rotel RC-1572 mkII . However, you will observe that the Rotel is considerably more expensive. 5k nits brightness / 9. Home. 5. Marantz Model 40n 70 watts into 8-ohms. The Arcam and Rotel fall Denon vs Marantz vs Yamaha -Receiver for 13. Bias is a huge, especially when the comparison is not level-matched and blind. NAD 3020i VS Rotel RA-01. Texas Instruments (owns) builds the Burr Brown DAC used in both the Denon & Rotel. Dirac Live is superior and the NAD is built like a tank compared to the Anthem. Of course, each brand has different devices at different price points. Rotel makes great amplifiers but when it comes to HT processors IMO the Marantz is slightly better. Gian Marco Hello again. soundmig. Denon AVR-X8500H vs Marantz vs Yamaha Build quality. Also interesting your perspective on hearing the Marantz. 0. I am currently using the AV7005 with the Rotel 1575 and im very happy with the results. 5 point for being capable of driving any tough load speakers) I have listen to both the Marantz AV7005 & MM7055 as well as the Rotel 1570 & 1575. 5, Magnepan LRS, Audioengine A2+ Subs: Rythmik FV25HP, Rythmik FV15HP, Velodyne HGS 12, Velodyne VA1512. Jul 21, 2022. Head-Fi: Denon DCD-2500ne>Lehmann Linear, Oppo PM1, Focal Clear MG, Denon AH-D9200, Meze Liric 2. Based on my experiences all three players: Rotel, NAD, and Marantz are not known for their bass extension, slam, & punch. If you have any interest in SACD, the Denon DCD-1600NE is worth an audition. Hi-Fi You need to get the Rotel or Marantz or Yamaha or Denon or anything on the bright side of things. The Tribute Apart from that: If I'd have to choose between these two from sight only I would pick the Rotel. Guest. Note that I currently have a Marantz SR5007 that is having some weird problems with not switching sources at times (very intermittent), so ANY of the three are going to be a step up. It's cheap though and you get 7 channels. Unsure which ones. I am wanting to upgrade my system but i am still not sure to go class A/B or class D. 'My opinions expressed here do not represent those of the AVForums or its associated websites'. Audiolab 6000A 50 Rotel and Cambridge are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry that produce high-quality speakers, headphones, soundbars, subwoofers, and amplifiers. Rotel A12 MKII 60 watts into 8-ohms. Rotel A14 MKII 80 watts into When it comes to choosing a stereo amplifier, two popular options that often come into consideration are the Rotel A11 Tribute and the Marantz PM6007. In this review, we will be comparing C 338 and A12 MKII, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Rotel. NAD C 388 Key Specs. in physics. Fending off competition from the likes of Marantz, Rega, Cyrus and Arcam, the C370 impressed us in all areas, from its sheer power to its ability to be controlled and delicate when needed. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 3050 and Rotel A14 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. 30 pages NAD). Only stating what my ears hear and the NAD and marantz 2 channel (non AV) sound very similar but Rotel sounds very different on the same speakers. The Rotel is the last project that the late great Ken Ishiwata worked on so it must be a decent piece of kit. The Denon DCD-600E and the Marantz CD5005 are among the best-sounding CD players for anyone on a limited budget. pl/RdiKCk. This is not a deal breaker for me. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz PM7000N and Rotel A14 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Borish in London, England, in 1972. Audiolab 6000A I am curious as to thoughts around the new Marantz AV10 vs the Anthem AV90. Denon DCD-600NE was also endorsed 2 times: by treblezine. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 389 and Rotel A14 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Rotel A14 MKII and NAD C 700 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I preferred the the 1575 over the MM7055, but i do like D class amps. Both Yamaha and Marantz receivers come in a durable construction that creates an engaging soundstage, but Yamaha tends to be a beast when it comes to features and input options. The Marantz was far better for HT and has more feature, the Rotel sounded better for music. Rotel RA-1592 . Marantz PM6007 Key Specs. Sure audition the Rega if you can and if you get the impression it sounds faster than the Marantz then go for it, I just highly doubt that 2 amps of that quality would provide a sound clearly better than the other particularly with the quality of the 2 Receivers, Amps, and Processors CD Player Comparison – Denon DCD-600NE vs Marantz CD5005 . The Arcam CD 17 is the best of the bunch but the CD73 and 1072 are really pick 'em. To be paired with existing Sony DH190 amp and Q Acoustics 3020i speaker setup. Thread starter Ande3200; Start date Feb 22, 2016; Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. It uses copper plates to the heat syncs which help to dissipate heat. This article will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at the sound quality, durability, price and so on. Rotel RB-1552 MkII. Rotel RCD-1072 both using DAC PCM Burr Brown PCM-1732 which utilize 24 bit/96 KHz sampling please give suggestion and advise and why many thanks . NAD C 389 Key Specs. At this point I am losing faith in the M10 and even though I like the features and sound Any sound difference between these amps could easily get drowned by speakers and room. CodecCowboy Well-Known Member. Of course, each brand has different devices at different Rotel v Marantz, and Dali v a pair of Wharfedales. . 1 speakers. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Rotel S14 and Marantz Model 40n first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Reply. Both brands have a rich history and a reputation for crafting exceptional audio components, but their approaches and strengths differ in subtle yet significant ways. I don't mind because I was never able to tell the difference between class A and AB, and at normal listening level power outputs, I think you stay within the class A part of AB anyway. ) All of these players support recordable media. Reply reply ericwithakay Detailed comparison of the Marantz Model 50 vs NAD C 399 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Go with Marantz, Denon, Onkyo or Yamaha. Parasound Halo Integrated. ? I know the Rotel 1572 has the Wolfson DAC but the tribute has the TI DAC and the Ken Ishiwata (RiP) tweaks. J. I understand his post. Musicality was of prime importance to me. The Anthem was probably the least favorite of all of the AVR/AVP that I have In this review, we will be comparing PM6007 and A14 MKII, two Integrated Amplifiers from Marantz and Rotel. Audio. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD Masters Series M33 and Rotel Diamond RA-6000 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. We sold Yamaha. Glad to hear someone else agrees with me on Yamaha. blakey72. I am considering purchasing the Rotel CD11 Tribute or Marantz CD6007 player. Audiolab 6000A Adding a Rotel RMB-1095 200x5 amp was the final icing on the cake. And Murali sir, I am a great fan of NAD and have few equipments of NAD like 218THX power amplifier, Nad 1000 pre , Nad C 162 Pre and Nad CD 542 ( giving lot of problem lately). NAD C 3050 BluOS-D is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the A14 MKII is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. Go. Audiolab 6000A Power: Marantz sr7008, NAD C 275Bee x 2, Video: Oppo 103, Samsung 75un6300 LG oled c9 77 Speakers: Focal aria 948, Focal cc900, Klipsch synergy KSF 10. Try and find a local place where you and your old man can hear these. And IIRC the Marantz uses the AKM4490 which is used in many other digital devices (DACs / CDP's Rotel every time. Comparison of NAD C 368 and Rotel A14 based on specifications, reviews and ratings. Additionally the lower end Rotel RCD-06 is also surprisingly more expensive than the NAD high end C542. also not sure how long lasting will be since it will be operating at 100w all the time, In this review, we will be comparing C 700 and Model 40n, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Marantz. I had a NAD M10 purchased in March 2020 that failed and was replaced by another unit, which also failed. I'm a tube guy all the way, so weigh that in on my assessment. Hasi In my own system, I have a 7:1 ratio between the list price of my speakers compared with the rest - streamer / DAC / room correction / amp. ROTEL RA02. since DACs are mostly inaudible in terms of difference. Between Marantz and Rotel, I'd probably lean Rotel as I feel their power is cleaner and bit more neutral. Thank you in advance Greetings from Italy and I beg you pardon for my mistakes. Hi-Fi for instance the upgrades to the Marantz CD63-II KI, a player about 16 years old now, but for which you could spend hundreds that would go some way to getting a new disc spinner that'd do as good or a In this review, we will be comparing A14 MKII and C 399, two Integrated Amplifiers from Rotel and NAD. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 328 and Marantz PM6007 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. After listenting to them, I thought the NAD separates Detailed comparison of the NAD C 389 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. It's a perfectly good CDP. Luxman r-113 has a more bloated bass on these speakers. com (15 Feb 2024) and Comparing Rotel CD11 Tribute and Marantz CD6007? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. 5kg. (or even class B it seems) The amp is going to be paired with PMC Prodigy 1 speakers and the SVS SB-1000 pro subwoofer. 150 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC; Phono Input Alternatively I have heard PSB Image T5 , I dont know why, I did not like the sound, It was paired with a Rotel Integrated amplifier. Sound quality is the number one factor to me, and listening to music is my main purpose. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 338 and Rotel A12 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I listened to them both running a pair of B&W bookshelf speakers and sure enough the Rotel sounded better with those speakers in the showroom. Both amplifiers cater to audiophiles and music enthusiasts, but they have distinct characteristics and design Detailed comparison of the NAD D 3020 V2 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. The NAD 3050 is probably more what you're after. Audiolab 6000A Nad c375bee vs rotel rb 1582. In the realm of high-fidelity audio, the choice between Marantz and NAD integrated amplifiers has long been a topic of debate among discerning audiophiles. Barney Detailed comparison of the NAD C 389 vs Marantz PM8006 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Audiolab 6000A 50 watts I was planning to invest in a stereo amp after a lot a options I have now come down to Marantz PM8006 which has 70 watts output per channel and Nad C388 which has 150 watts output per channel. Could shake the upstairs while in the basement In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . Audiolab 6000A 50 watts Over this past weekend the dealer loaned me the NAD C 388 (although ultimately they concluded it would not be a great match for the R700). Nad m10 v2 vs Marantz model 30 vs nad c399 which one is best. I would place Marantz between them. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 338 and Rotel A12 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Looking for the best clean As of 10 Dec 2024, experts prefer Marantz CD6007 over Denon DCD-600NE, but both CD Players have solid expert endorsements. This comprehensive guide will delve into the On the "preamp" side it seems to be a choice between "tick all of the boxes, even ones I might not need" or "source selector + gain". Thread starter admin_exported; Start date Mar 18, 2011; Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar. NAD 2200PE (which will be upgraded/refurbished in a couple of weeks) CD and HCA1000(outdoor sound), Dynaco PAS4, Denon DP1200 w/Shure V15 Type V and Jico SAS stylus, Marantz UD7007 The only hardware difference is that the Marantz has a headphone jack & the Denon does not. 00 for inferior speaker outpost quality plus 0. I used to have a Nad 521i, which packed up last year,paired with a Nad 314 amp, and acoustic energy evo floorstanders. It's amusing how un-googleable the name of this one is, though. Audiolab 6000A The Best CD Players for 2023 include some fantastic units from NAD, Naim, Rotel, Marantz, Audiolab, Cambridge Audio and more. Rotel RA-1572 MKII is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Model 40n is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. I've owned and listened to many high-end gears (Mark Levinson, Bryston, McIntosh, Anthem, NAD, Rotel, Classe, etc). Asking Comparison Rotel RCD-1072 VS Marantz CD-6005. My main focus is Surround Sound (DVD-A, DTS) and Red Book CD playback. So, take your time, compare the different models, and make the decision that’s right for you. NAD C 338 Key Specs. vs. The AV8805 seems to be a good choice pre pro but I wouldn't get the Marantz MM8077 power amp. Budget is around a thousand or under, I am in Australia and have sourced all these for under a grand. Different leagues in terms of audio performance. The best combination by far. Overview of Marantz vs NAD Brief History and Review of NAD. Marantz makes great pre pro but not the mult-channel amps. Pioneer and Rotel definitely sounded better. All the Adcom amps I ever owned never had an issue and I still have one a 535II. In this article, we will cover a general overview of both I'm gonna buy a Pro-ject Debut Carbon EVO turntable and probably a pair of Wharfedale EVO 4. How would you compare the Marantz's sound compared to the Rotel? Guest. I have an ATLP120xUSB, A Pro-Ject Phono Box S2, and a pair of JBL305PMkII. NAD M22 & M27 amps. We had Marantz and NAD and I though they were a much better choice than Yamaha in the 90's and early 2000's. As for zoom well almost never has anything good to say. Posted October 12, 2020. And Anthem or McIntosh, if you want to spend that much . Marantz Model 30; Michi X3; McIntosh MA7000 (used) NAD M33; Parasound HINT 6; Rotel RA-1592mkII; I've considered other offerings from Arcam, Benchmark, Cambridge, Denon, Hegel, Luxman, Schiit and Yamaha but Rotel RHT-10 Rotel RT-990BX SAE Mark tuners Sansui TU-417 Sansui TU-517 Sansui TU-717 Sansui TU-719 Sansui TU-919 Sansui TU-9900 Sansui TU-D99X Sansui TU-S9 Marantz 125 NAD 402 (what a sleeper this cheapo is) SAE MK VIB Quad FM3 Quad FM4 Quad AM1 Pilot MKIV -a lso used with the Scott and Fisher Stereo MPX'ers. I just want the best of the two. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz PM6007 and Rotel A11 Tribute first before getting into our more detailed comparison. I can't tell the difference between it and my Arcam CD72T (supposedly a Summary: The Best Nad vs Marantz Amplifier. However, Marantz amplifiers offer better resolution, bass, and mid Generally, Marantz audio devices, in particular the AV receivers, tend to outperform their NAD counterparts of similar specifications and price range. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Rotel A14 MKII and NAD C 399 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Skip to main content 12 reasons to shop with us. Rotel Diamond Series RA-6000 200 watts into 8-ohms. I don’t really care too much for the BluOS streaming which seems to the biggest difference between the 2 and the Marantz Av7005 AND mm7055 amp VS Rotel RSP-1572 AV Processor with RMB-1575 Thread starter Mike Bassi; Start date Jul 24, Other pre/pros with room EQ include models by Onkyo/Integra and NAD. 50 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC; Phono Input . Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 388 and Rotel A14 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. NAD is probably better for speakers that are harder to drive, they work well with 4 ohm speakers and are rated for 4 ohms, while marantz is typically rated Right now I have a 5. Black Friday Gift Guide: The Best Tech Deals in Rotel vs. This was back in 2015: "Nope, joking aside, the CD player was obviously the Marantz, combined with the Rotel amp and Zensor 1s. Audiolab 6000A 50 watts into 8-ohms. In this article, we will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at the sound quality, durability, price, and so on. D. I have heard very good things about the Marantz CD6006 UK edition however I havent heard much about the Rotel CD11 Tribute. If you have a really good DAC, You might consider the Cambridge CXC CD transport. Detailed comparison of the NAD C 399 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. I can't really compare it to an HK, NAD, Rotel or Marantz amp as it's been so long since I've heard any of these. The 3140 replaced a Marantz 2230. Interested in people's experience of any or all. I like both the Rotel and the ArcamsI still own an old modded Rotel. Just for fun, let's compare the Rotel A12 vs Marantz SR5009 (equivalent to Denon X2300). Jump to Latest Living Room: Marantz SR5009 -> Rotel RB-993 -> B&W N804/HTM1 Rythmik F12SE. So the equipment involved was: Yamaha RX-A2040 (they didn't have the 2020 anymore obviously), Marantz PM-8005, NAD C356BEE, Rotel RA-12, Rotel RA-1570, Cambridge Audio 651A, all on the B&W 683 S2. Yamaha A-S501 vs Denon PMA-600NE vs MARANTZ PM6007 vs Rotel A10 . You can always buy both and return the loser. Joined May 17, 2007 Messages 36,171 Solutions 3 Reaction score 27,047 What I noticed is the weight of the NAD, more than half that of the Marantz, 3kg as opposed to the 6006's 6. I felt the sound was thin, perhaps a bit on the bright side (could be the audessey xt) so i started to just use the marantz by itlsef and noticed a pretty good sound quality (thought not extremely better) so i felt that i didnt need to keep NAD C 546BEE $549 This entirely new design sports the latest 24-bit Wolfson DAC chips. dotVIBE Junior Audioholic. I'm running first version B&W 703s for the mains, along with the matching HTM7 for the centre, DS6 S3s for the surrounds, and a Paradigm Sub-12 for subwoofer duty. Rotel has been manufacturing CD players since 1989 and for the CD11 it teamed up with Ken Ishiwata to create a special-edition version of the Rotel CD11: the CD11 Tribute. If you seek these qualities, I suggest looking into Cary, Krell, and Esoteric to start off. Audiolab 6000A 50 Marantz CD6007 vs Rotel CD11 Tribute vs Denon DCD 600NE . I use one with the matching CXN V2 Network music streamer/Digital Pre-amp and it The amps reviewed in this shootout are the Emotiva XPA Gen 3, 5 channel Amplifier with 300 watta x 2 or 250 watts x 5. Both the Rotel 1572 mkII and the Marantz CD 6007 are probably good values though. It is not a good amp and not very competent. What is your opinion on which model to choose? The price difference between the two doesn't bother me. The Marantz sounded every bit as good to me (with a lesser CD player) for $360 less. The NAD C370 was our favourite amp for two years running, despite being "no looker" - but then it's not alone in that department. However what I am suggesting is that if he could step I had the marantz sr 7007 receiver connected as a preamp to a rotel rmb 1095 pushing monitor audio rx6's. Detailed comparison of the NAD C 368 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Cambridge Audio CXA60 Integrated Amplifier (Solid State) By Vanbel Started November 26. In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . In this review, we will be comparing C 3050 BluOS-D and Model 40n, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Marantz. Chris . Free 2-day In this review, we will be comparing PM6007 and A12 MKII, two Integrated Amplifiers from Marantz and Rotel. I've looked up some information, but can't really decide between the Rotel A11 tribute, the NAD C316 or the Marantz PM6007. They sound very good. Save Share Reply Quote Like. I then upgraded to a Marantz PM 7200 95WPC because the Rotel was too bass heavy and was swamping out Primary: Philips OLED806, Panasonic DP-UB820, Marantz SA8005, Rotel T14, Marantz PM8005, B&W 603 (2018 model), BK P12-300SB-PR Secondary: Marantz CD52MkII, Marantz 2238B Receiver, Philips RH22-456/B&W DM610i, BK XLS200MkII FF. 1 of 3 Go to page problem. I also noticed over time the Rotel amp got more noisy. I quit traveling consistently in 17 so I have only heard Yamaha a few times since then. Source | Preamp | DAC Hi need help deciding between the 2. Detailed comparison of the NAD C 388 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Detailed comparison of the NAD Masters Series M10 V2 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. But while bi-amping the speakers has certainly made the sound 'easier', the actual largest difference to the sound was from changing the speakers, not the amps. There's a fantstic review of the T787 on Carlton AV's website. Amp - NAD 2200PE (which will be upgraded/refurbished in a couple of weeks) CD Player Sony CDP NAD M3 vs Musical Fidelity A5. In this article, we will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at sound quality, durability, price, and so on. The source was my USB stick on a similar priced Marantz tuner, so the DAC remained constant. posted 2012-Sep-2, 9:02 pm AEST ref: whrl What I can say so far is, despite starting the thread as Marantz vs Rotel, I don't think I In this review, we will be comparing PM6007 and A12, two Integrated Amplifiers from Marantz and Rotel. Audiolab 6000A I have the opportunity to do the A-B comparison between a Rotel/B&W combo and a NAD/Dynaudio combo when I purchased the DM 2-10 pair for my GF and this is my opinion of the two combo NAD 8. The company was acquired in 19 Marantz and Rotel are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. Rotel CD14 CD $799 The CD14 CD player doesn’t try to be anything but a CD player. Of course, each brand has different devices at different price points, however, we In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . It's clear they're trying to make a bit more of a brand gap between Denon and Marantz, I'm curious to see if it works. Somewhat on a more level playing field, I compared a Rotel that was roughly the same price as the Marantz. But NAD has a slight edge in the value department for gear under $800, IMO. My main source of music is Roon. This article will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at sound quality, durability, price and so on. It looks like the NAD has paint spots all over and also looks a bit neglected/dirty. The Rotel amp had more clarity and depth to it than the Marantz. It sounds fantastic but not worth the aggravation. On the other hand, NAD offers great build quality and outstanding warranty on all On the Receiver side I'm considering the Integra 7. Audiolab 6000A Did sound pretty good. The Rotel excels at rock and classical (unusual combo of strengths) and the Arcam is a better all 'rounder with a smooth presentation. JorgeLopez11. This does not apply to IMO the Rotel RB-1582 MKii is by far a better amplifier than the Marantz MM7025. To me, NAD's are just a bit less refined and natural sounding compared to Rotel gear. An advantage with going with separates is that once you have a set of amps appropriate for your Detailed comparison of the NAD C 368 BluOS-2i vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. New Acoustic Dimension (NAD)is an electronics firm founded by Dr. Ian White August 16, 2023. Forums. T. Get FREE 2-day shipping and free lifetime tech support with your order. By AvailMail Started October 11. In this review, we will be comparing C 389 and A14 MKII, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Rotel. Thread starter M1chael; Start date Dec 15, 2016; 1; 2; 3; Next. Rotel A14 MKII 80 watts into 8-ohms. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Marantz PM6007 and Rotel A12 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Given those three, I'd probably go with Rotel, NAD, Marantz in that order. 2-ch AV receiver. Of course, each brand has different devices at different Detailed comparison of Rotel RA-1592 vs NAD C375BEE features and specs, pros and cons. bikingbuddha; Feb 12, 2022; Solid State; Replies 4 Views 182. Ignore him. So a mix of both NAD and Marantz gear. Some audiophiles say newer Marantz is In the past I have tested Marantz, NAD and Rotel on B&W speakers, but not blind, and I thought I really heard the NAD being brighter than Rotel, Marantz being warmer than Rotel was the best thing that my ears had heard at the time but I'm looking for something different now just because I've already owned Rotel gear. 45 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC Rotel RA-810A (20W @ 8Ω) vs NAD 312 (25W @ 8Ω) vs Denon PMA-260 (36W @ 8Ω)CD player: Denon DCD 700AESpeakers: Triangle Antal XS Detailed comparison of the Marantz PM-10 vs NAD Masters Series M33 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. All of the NAD amps I have ever owned, and I have owned 5 or 6 of them, had issues with their relays and channels going out. Thread starter Hasi; Start date Feb 12, 2023; Tags b&w 702 s2 hegel nad rotel 1; 2; Next. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 700 and Marantz Model 40n first before getting into our more detailed comparison. In fact, My NAD 3140 integrated has been taking alot of punishment for over 20 years and refuses to die, or even show signs of deterioration. chrism1971, Dec 16, 2020 #6. Nad m10 v2 things i like small portable, i can stream from my phone not sure about sinad and etcs. 1 of 2 Go to page. The only difference between the two set-ups were the CD players (both were the same brands as the amps). Speaker Decision. Their amplifiers are great for anyone who wants clear and detailed sound output with decent bass. Location: San Diego. He carried the Rotel RA-1570 in addition to the NAD. By this time Marantz had (IMHO wisely) abandoned class A, though. Arcam and Marantz are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry that produce high-quality speakers, headphones, soundbars, subwoofers, amplifiers and receivers. Banned reference: whrl. 1886 posts · Joined 2003 Add to quote; Only show this user I was pretty much set on the NAD C375DAC until I went in to the local audio retailer. Review/Discussion Similar price bracket, all rated CD players. I can get a really good deal on the NAD for a demo model ($1500AUD) which brings to roughly the same price point as the Rotel ($1700AUD). I was on the same page deciding between NAD T758 v3 vs Anthem MRX 520 vs Marantz SR5012. Audiolab 6000A 50 watts The Rotel CD11 Tribute has a lot of early failures and problems including the first one I got. Marantz PM6007 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the A11 Tribute is a speaker. Detailed comparison of the NAD C 338 vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. In this article, we will conduct a detailed comparison between the Rotel A11 Tribute and the Marantz Rotel A11 Tribute vs The main difference was in the sound character, not quality. The disc player’s sound is extremely natural, with rich detail, excellent retrieval of ambient information, deep black backgrounds, and a somewhat crisp overall presentation. Ultimately, the best NAD vs Marantz amplifier for you is the one that meets your needs and budget. The 2230 couldn't touch the NAD sound wise. The Rotel RA-1062 has significantly less power, which affects its ability to handle dynamic rock music. NAD M10 V2 vs Arcam SA30 as an upgrade to my current stereo set up. Edit: I run a NAD c356BEE, a NAD 3240pe (more from the 3020i era) and a Rotel RA-1520 Can you please help me to choose between one Rotel ra04 se used (about 150£) and Marantz PM6005 new? (same price if I exchange my old Arcam alpha8p). NAD 3020 is the most famous product manufactured by the brand in the 1970s. Its served me well, til now, with Arcam Vs Rotel; Nad Vs Rotel; Marantz Vs Rotel; Yamaha Vs Rotel; Rotel Vs Cambridge Audio; Pros and Cons of Arcam: Pros: Known for producing high-quality audio components, including amplifiers, receivers, and Detailed comparison of the NAD C 399 BluOS-D vs Marantz Model 40n amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. 2 Professional Surround Sound. Also, Steve Guttenberg was I like this one myself as a mid-fi player with many great reviews from the press and owners alike. But it seems that the Marantz's are used more in rotation the the NAD . Both brands offer excellent sound quality, build quality, and features. Being a owner of both NAD and Marantz , it would be hard to pick one over the other . Rotel amps tended to sound more aggressive, NADs sounded warmer, especially the amps made in the 80s and 90s. NAD Electronics, an abbreviation for New Acoustic Dimension, is a known manufacturer of audio products, including home hi-fi speakers, amplifiers, AV receivers, and other related products. On paper the NAD C399 looks very interesting with the new Hypex nCore modules Build quality compared to Marantz, Denon, Yamaha is good, but not good enough. Next Last. My point is I would stay away from NAD. D. /Rotel/NAD are more musical sounding than competing products from companies like Pioneer/Denon/Yamaha . That may be extreme and not as Whether its vinyl, streaming, legacy CDs or more, an integrated amp is a great choice for a lot of music lovers, who prefer integrated amps over home theater Hello there, aspiring audiophile with little technical knowledge. Replies 31 Views 10K. Rotel and NAD aren't bad sounding, I just don't hear a Detailed comparison of the NAD Masters Series M10 V2 vs NAD C 700 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. 130 watts RMS into 8-ohms; Built-in DAC; Phono Input; USB Input NAD 326BEE vs. Toggle navigation. I listen to cd (Cambridge audio azur 640C) and vinyl (Thorens TD 318 MKII freshly restored). ) Hegel H390 vs Rotel Michi X5 vs NAD M33. In this review, we will be comparing C 388 and A14 MKII, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Rotel. Their sound output is non-fatiguing. The Rotel beats the Marantz in terms of both features and power, but I can live without most of those extra features, and supposedly the PM-14S1's 90 watts are In this review, we will be comparing C 328 and PM6007, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Marantz. :cool: Which AMP/DAC combo would you prefer Rotel has been hard at work updating its amplifier range and the RA-1592 MkII is the top of the tree. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 338 and Rotel A11 Tribute first Anyone know the difference in sound or build quality between the Rotel 1572 and Tribute CD11. When comparing NAD vs Marantz, NAD audio devices offer warm sound output. NAD Masters Series M33 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the Diamond Series RA-6000 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. Search. 4 system in 6,000+cft loft / When it comes to integrated amplifiers, NAD and Marantz are renowned brands that offer exceptional audio quality and features. One of the major design flaws of the CD11 is that when the tray is open, you need That said, the highest receiver I owned was the "almost flagship" Marantz SR8200. Audiolab 6000A Rotel CD11 Tribute Rotel CD11. Even better, they both have a solid construction with a clean look that allows you to adjust the music performance to your preference easily. 5 lac as I have been suggested to purchase a audiolab 6000n with the marantz as it does not have bluetooth connectivity. Rotel RA-03 Tested at In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . What is better to choose Rotel RA-1592 or NAD C375BEE ? Videos, photos and reviews on E-Catalog Marantz PM8006. 100% music and I stream ~15k tracks via a Squeezebox to an (old) Onkyo TX-82. Marantz, or Pioneer. Perhaps the NAD would Here is a short comparison if you don’t wish to read everything: NAD amplifiers tend to outperform Marantz amplifiers of similar specifications and prices. liemjerry; Jun 26, 2017; Digital Sources; 2. 5 (10 points max minus 1. gibbsy Moderator. I think those Polk LSIM 707 deserves better amplification than the Marantz MM7025 can provide. vqs divd jdaqzg ijrsn vgfss warqe ccqli tachwz jlil rgxg